Hillary Clinton Accepts Blame for Benghazi Attack – A Closer Look
Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has publicly acknowledged her role and responsibility in the 2012 Benghazi attack, a tragic event that resulted in the deaths of four Americans, including U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens. Clinton’s acceptance of blame came during a series of congressional hearings and media appearances where she was questioned about the circumstances surrounding the attack.
During her testimony before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in January 2013, Clinton said:
“As I have said many times since September 11, I take responsibility. Nobody is more committed to getting this right. I am determined to leave the State Department and our country safer, stronger, and more secure.”
The Benghazi attack occurred on the night of September 11, 2012, when armed militants stormed the U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya. The incident sparked widespread political controversy, with questions raised about the level of security at the compound and the U.S. government’s response during and after the attack.
Clinton’s acknowledgment was part of a broader investigation into the event, including an 11-hour hearing in October 2015 before the House Select Committee on Benghazi. Throughout the hearings, Clinton defended her actions while also acknowledging lapses in security and communication that contributed to the tragedy.
Her statement—“What difference, at this point, does it make?”—uttered during one hearing, was widely quoted and became a focal point of debate, interpreted by critics as dismissive but defended by supporters as a call to focus on preventing future tragedies.
While multiple bipartisan investigations found no deliberate wrongdoing by Clinton, the Benghazi incident remained a significant point of scrutiny throughout her career and during her 2016 presidential campaign.
Clinton’s willingness to accept responsibility, even amid intense political pressure, underscored her position as the nation’s top diplomat at the time and her role in overseeing U.S. embassies and foreign service staff.
Let me know if you’d like a summary of the investigations, timelines, or reactions from both political parties regarding the Benghazi hearings.
News
Did Barack Obama Begin the Downfall of America? A Balanced Look at His Legacy
Did Barack Obama Begin the Downfall of America? A Balanced Look at His Legacy The question of whether Barack Obama initiated the downfall of America is one…
Do You Support President Trump Transferring Deported Venezuelan Gang Members to El Salvador?
Do You Support President Trump Transferring Deported Venezuelan Gang Members to El Salvador? In the realm of U.S. immigration policy and national security, few topics have garnered…
A promising young gentleman and a possible future President?
A promising young gentleman and a possible future President? Happy 19th Birthday, Barron Trump — one of the most popular teenagers on earth! And now, for his…
Should Marco Rubio Revoke Visas and Green Cards of Hamas Supporters in America? A Deep Dive into the Debate
Should Marco Rubio Revoke Visas and Green Cards of Hamas Supporters in America? A Deep Dive into the Debate In the wake of growing concerns about terrorism…
HEADS-UP: They Mocked You, But Trump’s Still on Top, Ready to Win Again…
Should the Fired USAID Inspector General Be Investigated for Allowing Years of Fraud and Abuse Within the Department? In recent months, the firing of the USAID Inspector…
Breaking: They Called You ‘Deplorable’—Now It’s Time to Prove Them Wrong…
The question of whether Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas should be charged with treason for the use of FEMA funds in assisting migrants—including those who may be…
End of content
No more pages to load