Sikandar tanked because I couldn’t execute it well, says AR Murugadoss: ‘I pulled off a Ghajini because it was a remake’

In the world of cinema, the collaboration between a superstar and an acclaimed director often generates immense anticipation and excitement. Such was the case with *Sikandar*, a film that brought together Bollywood superstar Salman Khan and renowned South Indian filmmaker AR Murugadoss. Known for his successful films like *Ghajini* and *Holiday*, Murugadoss was expected to deliver yet another blockbuster. However, the film’s disappointing performance at the box office left fans and critics alike questioning what went wrong. In a recent interview, Murugadoss opened up about the challenges he faced during the making of *Sikandar*, shedding light on the complexities of filmmaking and the importance of execution.

The Anticipation Surrounding *Sikandar*

When the announcement of *Sikandar* was made, it created a buzz in the film industry. Salman Khan, one of Bollywood’s most bankable stars, was set to collaborate with a director known for his knack for storytelling and engaging narratives. The film was touted as a high-budget project that would showcase Khan in a new light, similar to the way *Jawan* had revitalized the career of another superstar, Shah Rukh Khan. Fans eagerly awaited the film’s release, hoping for a cinematic experience that would live up to the hype.

The marketing campaign for *Sikandar* was extensive, with trailers and promotional events designed to build excitement. The film was positioned as a major release, and expectations soared. However, as the release date approached, whispers of concern began to circulate. Would Murugadoss be able to replicate his past successes with a different star and audience?

AR Murugadoss ADMITS Salman Khan's 'Sikandar' failed at box office because  he 'couldn't execute it well': 'But when the audience…'

 

The Language Barrier: An Initial Excuse

Upon the film’s release, *Sikandar* faced immediate criticism. Box office numbers were disappointing, and the film struggled to find its footing among audiences. In the aftermath, Murugadoss initially attributed the film’s underperformance to a language barrier. He suggested that the nuances of storytelling in Hindi cinema might not have translated effectively from his South Indian filmmaking style. This explanation resonated with some, as the differences in regional cinema can often lead to varying audience expectations and interpretations.

However, as time passed and the dust settled, it became clear that the issues with *Sikandar* ran deeper than just language. While Murugadoss’s acknowledgment of the language barrier was a valid point, it was not the sole reason for the film’s failure. The complexities of filmmaking extend beyond dialogue and cultural references; they encompass direction, storytelling, pacing, and character development.

A Candid Admission: The Real Issue

In a recent interview with Velaipechu Voice, AR Murugadoss took a bold step by admitting that the real issue with *Sikandar* lay in his own execution. This candid reflection is a rarity in the film industry, where directors and actors often deflect blame or make excuses for a project’s shortcomings. Murugadoss’s willingness to take responsibility for the film’s failure speaks volumes about his character and dedication to his craft.

He elaborated on the challenges he faced during the filmmaking process, including the pressure to deliver a hit and the expectations that came with working with a superstar like Salman Khan. The weight of these expectations can be overwhelming, and it can lead to creative decisions that may not align with the original vision. Murugadoss’s admission highlights the importance of staying true to one’s artistic instincts, even in the face of external pressures.

The Importance of Execution in Filmmaking

Murugadoss’s reflection on execution raises an important point about the filmmaking process. Execution encompasses a wide range of elements, including script development, casting, direction, cinematography, and editing. Each of these components plays a crucial role in shaping the final product. A well-executed film can elevate a mediocre script, while poor execution can undermine even the most compelling story.

In the case of *Sikandar*, it appears that the execution fell short in several areas. Critics pointed to issues with pacing, character development, and overall coherence. The film struggled to engage audiences, and many viewers left the theater feeling unsatisfied. This serves as a reminder that even the most talented filmmakers can falter if they do not pay careful attention to the execution of their vision.

Lessons Learned and Moving Forward

Despite the disappointment surrounding *Sikandar*, AR Murugadoss’s candid admission offers valuable lessons for both filmmakers and audiences. For filmmakers, it underscores the importance of self-reflection and accountability. The ability to recognize one’s shortcomings and learn from them is essential for growth in any creative field. Murugadoss’s willingness to confront the challenges he faced serves as an inspiration for aspiring directors and writers.

For audiences, the situation highlights the unpredictable nature of filmmaking. Even with star power and a talented director, there are no guarantees of success. The film industry is a complex ecosystem, and numerous factors can influence a film’s reception. Fans should approach new releases with an open mind, understanding that not every collaboration will yield the desired results.

Conclusion

The story of *Sikandar* serves as a poignant reminder of the challenges and complexities of filmmaking. AR Murugadoss’s candid reflection on the film’s shortcomings sheds light on the importance of execution and the pressures that come with high expectations. While the film may not have achieved the success that many hoped for, it has provided valuable lessons for both filmmakers and audiences alike. As Murugadoss continues his journey in the film industry, it will be interesting to see how he applies these lessons to future projects, and whether he can once again capture the magic that made his earlier films so beloved. In the ever-evolving landscape of cinema, the ability to learn from failures is what ultimately paves the way for future successes.